|
|
|
| Registros recuperados: 2.039 | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Mundlak, Yair; Cavallo, Domingo; Domenech, Roberto. |
| In 1982 Dominga Cavallo and Yair Mundlak received an award for quality of research discovery from the American Agriculture Economics Association for IFPRI Research Report 36, Agriculture and Economic Growth in an Open Economy: The Case of Argentina. The research was sponsored jointly by IFPRI and the Instituto de Estudios Economicos Sobre la Realidad Argentina y Latinoamericana (IEERAL) of the Fundacion Mediteranea, and it in turn built on earlier prize-winning research by Mundlak, presented in Research Report 6, Intersectoral Factor Mobility and Agricultural Growth. The model developed for the study makes it possible to explore the effects of policies directed at agriculture as well as general macro and trade policies, taking into account interaction... |
| Tipo: Report |
Palavras-chave: Agriculture; Economic aspects; History; 20th Century; Economic conditions; Econometric models; International Development. |
| Ano: 1989 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/42166 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Moreano, H.. |
| Durante el desarrollo de la Primera Expedición Ecuatoriana a la Antártida se visitaron y exploraron varios lugares, a fin de escoger entre ellos el más idóneo para la instalación de la Primera Estación Científica Ecuatoriana. Punta Hennequin, Punta Fort William, Bahía Falsa y Puerto Arturo son sitios que presentan sus propias particularidades, unas en apoyo y otras en contra de los propósitos de la estación, pero en el balance parecía ser que Punta Fort William es la que mejor se adapta a las necesidades ecuatorianas; aunque ésto no significa que se haga un continuo esfuerzo para localizar el mejor sitio para la Primera Estación Ecuatoriana. |
| Tipo: Journal Contribution |
Palavras-chave: Installation; Polar zones; Antarctic zone; Inshore stations. |
| Ano: 1989 |
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1834/3828 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Barton, David G.. |
| Cooperatives can handle a loss in several ways. This paper evaluates two primary alternatives: retain in the cooperative or allocate to patrons. The cooperative’s and patrons’ preferences are based on choosing either a tax reduction or redemption reduction. Present value of cash flow is used as the criterion for evaluating choices. The cooperative’s and patrons’ preferences may be in harmony or conflict depending on the marginal income tax rates and pattern of equity redemption. A simple procedure is presented to determine a cooperative or patron preference. |
| Tipo: Journal Article |
Palavras-chave: Agribusiness. |
| Ano: 1989 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/46220 |
| |
| Registros recuperados: 2.039 | |
|
|
|
